5 Comments
User's avatar
GabrielM's avatar

This drive to identify sex realism / "gender critical" beliefs as "pseudoscience" seems like a classic case of DARVO (a strategy much beloved of trans activists): Deny, Accuse (or Attack), Reverse Victim and Offender.

It also tallies with a drive to flood scientific journals with trans pseudoscience, as reported recently on Substack by the evolutionary biologist Colin Wright, of "Reality's Last Stand".

https://colinwright.substack.com/p/the-war-on-biology-is-far-from-over?r=1v55zm&utm_medium=ios

GabrielM's avatar

And the profits to be made from transactivism by double-dealing outfits like the SPLC, with its "hate map" identification to spur on conflict / recruit further donors, fits into the "gender industrial complex" identified by Jennifer Bilek.

This money-making complex includes "gender-affirming" therapy, manufacture & sale of puberty blockers & wrong-sex hormones to create medical patients for life, provision of "sex-reassignment" surgeries, etc etc.

Bilek has followed the money since 2014 when she was deplatformed as an environmental campaigner by trans activists.

Bilek, who reads company balance sheets to arrive at her financial estimates, reckoned the gender industrial complex was worth at least $5billion a year in the US alone, several years ago.

https://www.the11thhourblog.com

I have no idea what it might be worth now, worldwide. But clearly, as the lawfare phase hots up, there's even more money to be made from punitive damages in lawsuits.

And--as also pointed out by Colin Wright--that lawfare requires trans pseudoscience papers to flood once respectable science journals, to throw enough doubt on real science for hesitant judges to be justified in choosing between apparently respectable opinions.

GabrielM's avatar

"Transgender' is not a type of person. It is the conglomerate name for an array of corporate pressures which groom children and adults for industrial body dissociation, thus opening humanity to further corporate encroachments into our bodies."

--Jennifer Bilek

for the kids's avatar

Thank you!

Does giving money to an informant equal giving money to their organization? It seems crucially different?

It seems holding them responsible for libel would be more appropriate....

Isobel Ross's avatar

My understanding is that the SPLC is accused of funding provocateurs and leaders - those who whip up racial tensions and hate, not just informants.